第三题 What kind of people can now find a job as an English teacher?
题解： 本题有两处重要线索，只要找到一处，即能找到正确答案。这两处线索分别是：第三段的第一句话说，现在雇主们只去注意那些……的人，省略号的部分即是答题的关键。另一处线索是第四段的第二句话，“只要他们能……”，能答出此处，也是正确的。

要点： （1）问题是“什么样的人”，因此本题的作答应该是名词短语，最好用定语从句。

（2）题干中的“can”表明这是现在时，这是一个重要的线索。

其它的评分标准：

标准答案：

Those who are qualified.

Those who can teach English effectively.

l 可得2分的回答：

1) Those who have good skills and attitudes to teach effectively.

2) Both qualified native English speakers and non-native speakers.

3) Whoever has the knowledge, the skills and the right attitudes.

l 可得1.5分的回答：

1) Having the knowledge, the skill and teaching English effectively.

问题中问的是哪种人能找到教师工作，回答与提问不对应，仅提到应具备的素质，因此扣分。

2) Those who have knowledge and skills, can teach English effectively. 语言错误，应为，扣分。

3) Who can teach and have the required level of English. 语言错误，应添加，才能具有名词性，扣分。

l 可得1分的回答：

1) People who has knowledge, the skills and attitudes to teach English effectively. 语言错误，应为have，扣分。超词，扣分。

2) The knowledgeable, skillful people who have the required English level.

错误使用knowledgeable，该词意思是“渊博的”，与答案内容无关，扣0.5分。若具体回答成为一个英语教师的条件，应为the knowledge, the skills, and the right attitudes，回答中仅提到the skill一项，扣0.5分。

l 可得0.5分的回答：

1) The people who had the required level of English. 答案关键内容缺失较多，扣1分。时态错误，扣0.5分。

2) A people who have the attitudes to teacher English effectively. 句中语言错误较多，扣0.5分。句子语意与原文意义相差较远，扣1分。

l 可得0分的回答：

1) He’s the knowledge, the skills, attitudes to teach English effectively.

2) People can teach English effectively.

！！特别提示：

这两个回答看上去与问题毫不相关。但稍加改动即为正确答案：

1) He who has the knowledge … (1.5分)

2) People who can teach… (2分)

也许写下这两个回答的考生已经理解了文章，但由于他们严重错误的表达，他们的回答变得答非所问，不能得分。这一点请大家务必注意。

第四题What is the result of the “new form of discrimination”(Line 5, Para.4)?
题解： 这是类似于阅读理解中词义判断的题，但与做阅读理解不同的是，在阅读理解中存在两种词汇题，其一是考查学生利用上下文猜单词的能力，其二是考查根据上下文对（主要是熟悉的）词语的理解能力。而在简答题中，考查的对象主要是第二点。

就本题而言，原文中已经在括号中给出了不认识的单词的汉语意思，因此，这是不猜测词义的题，而是要求根据上下文判断这外短语在本文中的所指，是一道理解的题。

在找到第四段中的这个短语后，可以发现在“a new form of discrimination”的破折号之后的部分内容就是答案。稍微组织一下，可以全面的回答为 it singled out the unqualified and liberated the linguistically oppressed。

如果确实理解了这句话，可以看出它的意思是“它剔除了不合格的（教师），解放了以前在语言上受压迫的（教师）”。

要点： 问题是“……的结果”，应该用完整的句子作答。

其它的评分标准：

l 标准答案：

The linguistically oppressed are liberated.

Unqualified English teachers are singled out.

l 可得2分的回答：

1) The result is that the linguistically oppressed were liberated.

2) Singling out the unqualified, liberating the linguistically oppressed.

3) The unqualified teachers are singled out while the qualified liberated.

4) It liberated the non-native English teachers linguistically oppressed.

5) It selected the qualified teachers and singled out the unqualified.

l 可得1.5分的回答：

1) The inqualified English teachers are singled out. 语言错误，扣0.5分。

2) It single out the unqualified liberated ^ linguistically oppressed. 多处语言错误，扣0..5分。

3) To liberate the linguistically oppressed 不定式表将来，问题问的是已产生的后果，时间不符，扣0.5分。

l 可得1分的回答：

1) Qualification may be more important. 句子意义与短文内容不贴切，扣1分。

2) The non-native teachers replace those unqualified native teachers.

回答不准确，什么样的非本族语教师没有说清楚，这恰恰是答案的重要部分，扣1分。

3) The unqualified native English teachers will be fired.

句子时态错误，扣0.5分。句子含义不准确，扣0.5分。

l 可得0.5分的回答：

The non-natives could also become an English teacher.

与短文意义相差太远，扣1.5分。

l 得0分的回答：

1) Teachers are justified if they were qualified.

2) It will improve the teachers’ all kinds of level.

3) The non-native speaks are liberate.

完全答非所问，不得分。