南京大学1998年硕士研究生入学考试国际经济法



文件信息
文件来源 来自免费考研网每个热心网友无偿提供,你难道不贡献一下你的资料?商业行为请自觉走开 
文件作者  
更新时间 2005-3-15 12:55:32 
添加编辑 viewsnake 

辅助信息
打印功能 打印本文
背景颜色 杏黄 秋褐 胭红 芥绿 天蓝 雪青 炭灰 奶白
字体大小 特大号字 大号字 中号字 小号字
免责声明 本网站所有文章均来自网络,仅提供预览形式,不提供纸张形式,若涉及到版权的文章,请购买正版,毕竟在电脑上看也不舒服啊,呵呵,这是viewsnake个人网站,纯粹交流学习资料的地方。无商业行为。
选择更多免费考研资料:
阅读正文内容

一.名词解释:
市场准入.LSLP.外汇倾销.国家契约.Law-making Treaty.Sovereign Immunity.Letter

of Credit
二.论述题
1.试述限制性商业条款的性质,并说明我们对其应持的态度
2.何谓税收饶让抵免,税收饶让抵免和一般的外国税收抵免有哪些区别
3.说明国际公法,国际私法与国际经济法的关系
4.简述外商投资企业的注册资本与投资总额的法律含义及两者之间的关系
三。案例题
1.中国某公司(买方)与外国某公司签定了一批进口一批钢材的买卖合同.按合同规定,货

物分两批装运,支付方式为不可撤消的即期信用证.经买方申请,信用证有中国的银行开立

,每批货分别开立一份信用证,第一批货物装运后,卖方在有效期内向银行交单议付,议付

行审单后,即向该商*议付货款.随后开证行对议付行作了偿付.买方在收到第一批货物后

.发现货物品质与合同不符,因而要求开证行对第二批信用证项下的单据拒付款.请根据信

用证的法律关系及性质来回答:
1)你认为开证行能否拒绝付款,为什么
2)如果买方的要求遭到开证行的拒绝,你认为买方应采取何种措施?
*该商即外国某公司

2In April 1986,X,a Chinesee Radio Component Factory signed a contract in Beij

ing with Y,a US company for a capaciton production line worth 17 million yuan.

The equipment was to have been delivered before April 30,1987.but it did not

arrive even by September that year.The contract set out a penalty of one per

cent of the line value as compensation if the equipment was one to nine weeks

overdue.Another agreement was signed by the two parties in Octorber 1987 and

stipulated delivery by the end of December 1987,but it did not specify claims.

The equipment finally arrived in March 1988 i.e. eleven months late.Inspection

shows that 30 of the 113 imported pieces equipment were found to be second han
d
.Some were useless.The defect caused losses of 2.44 million yuan.Supplementary

agreement signed in May required the US company to replace the defective par-

ts of equipment before the end of October 1988.But to-date,none has arrived.

All this caused X,thefactory in Beijing a total loss of 3.7 million yuan.X t

hen filed a suit against Y in the people's Court for compensation of all the

losses.
Qestions:
1)Sice Y is an absent defendant residing outside the Chinese territory,in view
of the principle"the plaintiff follows the forum of the defendant"incorporate
d in Chinese procedure law,does the People's Court have jurisdiction over such
a
case ?Why?
2)What is the proper law lf the contract to be applied the People'Court,as the
re is no express choice of law provision in the contract?And why ?



<<<返回上一页 <<<返回网站首页
<<<您的位置:首页>专业试卷>江苏地区>南京大学考研专业课试卷>正文