南京大学1996年硕士研究生入学考试国际经济法



文件信息
文件来源 来自免费考研网每个热心网友无偿提供,你难道不贡献一下你的资料?商业行为请自觉走开 
文件作者  
更新时间 2005-3-15 12:55:09 
添加编辑 viewsnake 

辅助信息
打印功能 打印本文
背景颜色 杏黄 秋褐 胭红 芥绿 天蓝 雪青 炭灰 奶白
字体大小 特大号字 大号字 中号字 小号字
免责声明 本网站所有文章均来自网络,仅提供预览形式,不提供纸张形式,若涉及到版权的文章,请购买正版,毕竟在电脑上看也不舒服啊,呵呵,这是viewsnake个人网站,纯粹交流学习资料的地方。无商业行为。
选择更多免费考研资料:
阅读正文内容

一.名词解释
非歧视原则.CFR.单证严格相符原则.特别提款权.单独海损.关税减让原则.原产地规则.

注册资本
二.论述题
1.试述国际经济法的调整对象与法律特征
2.简述国际经济法的主要法律渊源,并请举例说明之
3.如何理解国际货物买卖中的权利担保原则
4.试述投资保护协定的法律含义与主要内容
三.案例题(中文回答)
INTRODUCTION
Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must
answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles

of international trade law to support your argument

Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American
company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD
1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese
company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market
has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed

back an acceptance.

Questions:
1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per

ton to USD 2,500 per ton?
2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese
company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer?

Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B

(an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity

,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between

them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked

B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter

was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication.

So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on

.So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the

goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was

under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a
formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of
China and international practice

Questions:
1)What is the main issue in this case?
2)If A brought the case before a Chinese people's court and if you were the ju
dge in handling the case ,how would you choose the applicable law to resolve

the dispute?



<<<返回上一页 <<<返回网站首页
<<<您的位置:首页>专业试卷>江苏地区>南京大学考研专业课试卷>正文