Few would dispute that the term applies to the Unabomber, those manifesto, published in 1995, scorns science and longs for return to a pretechnological utopia. But surely that does not mean environmentalists concerned about uncontrolled industrial growth are antiscience, as an essay in US News & World Report last May seemed to suggest.

　　The environmentalists, inevitably, respond to such critics. The true enemies of science, argues Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University, a pioneer of environmental studies, are those who question the evidence supporting global warming, the depletion of the ozone layer and other consequences of industrial growth.

　　Indeed, some observers fear that the antiscience epithet is in danger of becoming meaningless. “The term ‘antiscience’ can lump together too many, quite different things,” notes Harvard University philosopher Gerald Holton in his 1993 work Science and Anti Science. “They have in common only one thing that they tend to annoy or threaten those who regard themselves as more enlightened”

　　62. The author’s attitude toward the issue of “science vs. antiscience” is _____ .

　　[A] impartial

　　[B] subjective

　　[C] biased

　　[D] puzzling

　　[答案] A

　　[解题思路]

　　本文讨论的主要论题就是关于科学与文化在各个方面上的关系问题，其中举了很多互相矛盾的例子，之后又提出了antiscience这个问题，为读者提供了大量的信息。但是显然文章中并没有表示作者感情态度的词语出现，作者最后也没有做出明确的结论，说明他的态度是客观的，没有偏见的。

　　[题目译文]

　　作者对于“科学与反科学对立”这个问题的态度是 。

　　[A]公正的

　　[B]主观的

　　[C]有偏见的

　　[D]令人困惑的